Recalibrating Early Stages of Corporate Build – Johan Strömquist : 26

The Emerging Biotech Leader
The Emerging Biotech Leader
Recalibrating Early Stages of Corporate Build - Johan Strömquist : 26

“Getting a drug to market is a change journey. The whole process is a change journey. And we pass through so many different stages and gates on the way there: we need to adapt almost regardless of circumstances, even if everything goes according to plan, we have to shift.” Johan Stromquist, President, NDA Group

As the quote above alludes, launching a biotech is never a linear journey. While there are tried and true processes and a documented multidisciplinary approach in bringing assets to market, adaptation to change is also required.

And there’s no better trio equipped to discuss this vital topic–navigating change when planning and bringing innovations forward–than Kim Kushner, Doug Locke and Johan Stromquist.

During this Episode, a first for Johan in the guest seat, you’ll hear a candid discussion on the various transformational stages organizations go through at major inflection points of growth, both funding and clinical. We hope you agree, this topic could not be more timely or relevant. Today’s market and landscape are forcing all sorts of change regardless of biotech companies being in the early stages of corporate build or, much further along in maturity.

On that note, here are a few of the overarching themes to listen out for during this episode:

  1. Navigating people and resource sensitivities as a leader
  2. How to move past paralysis analysis when revising the former plan for a new one
  3. Scaffolding regulatory pieces as a framework for planning
  4. Assessing when to bring in council, partners and vendors as a stop gap and expert resource

True to form in each episode of The Emerging Biotech Leader, there is so much more covered including the types of people you need on your team (build vs operate talent), their key strengths and how to ensure you have both at the right time. With that foundation set, let's delve into some of the quotes and soundbites from Episode 26.

On Building, Fixing and Meeting Change Head On 

Kim kicked off this topic and conversation by first inviting Doug to weigh in on how leaders are thinking about their design–where to start and where to build–across inflection points.

Here’s what he’s been seeing in terms of the market and shifts. “I've been in about 15 meetings in the last three months where our corporate sponsors, usually the CEO, sometimes the CMO, or R+D regulatory head, they're up against some major change in the company. I mean, we all know what's going on in the marketplace right now with the cost of capital: interest rate, debtor and lender agreements are tough. Some movement there is precipitating a fresh look. At the timeline of the company relative to market facing goals and capital, you know the questions are, ‘Can we afford this program? Do we need to look at what we were going to deliver and are we going to change the timeline? Do we need to change the timeline because we don't have the bandwidth we thought we had?’ All of those issues are on the table. So a lot of different use cases of, ‘I have plenty of capital, but what we have is unworkable. I have limited capital and I have a goal that's too grand. And what do we do about that?’ This is the basis of the inflection point you're talking about.”

Doug goes on to detail the amount of people, processes and systems impacted by these changes. Leaders have to think through funding, the talent on the team, the marketplace, their board, and their investors as well.

If you should find yourself at a similar crossroads, Doug, Kim and Johan discuss how to start navigating this and here’s a hint. As cliche as it may sound, you don’t have to navigate it alone.

Johan shares, “I think that one of the greatest signs of leadership is the courage to ask for help. I think that is so important when you find yourself in these quite precarious leadership positions in biotech companies.”

In terms of the types of changes leaders are evaluating, Doug does go on to clarify. “Some are looking for a form of major intervention, maybe like a RIF or total change of go to market and others are seeking counsel. I.e ‘How can I make this happen?’”

As you’ve heard on the show before, it isn’t uncommon for early stage biotech founders and teams to have a lot to figure out. Kim sheds more light. “There's the concept that organizations in their earliest stages are trying to figure out, ‘Where do I build my initial programs? What country am I going to for my phase 2 because that seems to give me the greatest path forward from a regulatory perspective? And I need to figure out, ‘How am I going to get to market sooner than later somewhere?”

On the opposite side of that early stage planning and analysis, is the “fix stage” that Doug described when kicking this conversation off.

Listen more for Kim’s distinction between the two, early stage vs fix stage companies, around 4:40. 

As a key contribution to this topic, Johan shared that regardless of stage, building a biotech and getting a drug to market is a change journey.

“Even if everything goes according to plan, we have to shift. We have to adjust and we have to make changes because the people in the lab coats are not the people that are going to run our trials and the people who are running our trials are not the people who are going to sell our product, right? So there are these really important transformation points that every company that ultimately becomes successful just has to go through.”

The Role of Regulatory In Planning 

Another key piece of advice and insight from Johan pertained to regulatory. “At the end of the line, it's going to be that regulatory approval that ultimately provides the culmination of all of these years of success. I think from my point of view, and having

had the great fortune and honor of working in the regulatory space for the last 20 years, I think is very important. And it starts with scaffolding. I would say this is required to start forming the foundation for a meaningful plan and a meaningful organization going forward.”

Johan's answer sparked a follow up from Doug, “If I could pick up on a piece of what Johan just said, the sliver of work, the regulatory, I mean, that reminds me of a conversation last week. It was with a new CEO in an established company. It's a rebuild of sorts, right? New CEO in a company that has been around a bit. This CEO came from a company that was well funded and much larger. So they had a broader team, had a viable clinical organization, had a strong regulatory partner that reported to them, yet in the new company, it's not there. It's that trusted voice, that hallway. You know, walking down the hallway and getting a point of view, if not a more rigorous structured milestone type activity, it’s not there.”

We’ll let you hear for yourselves the main reason Doug felt compelled to share this story–it lays the groundwork for the next set of challenges a leadership team now needs to evaluate: the people part–specifically the build skillset vs the operate skillset.

Kim shared a poignant perspective on this as well. “It is often not an FTE or a full-time mindset of what you need to get from A to B, but you do need to bring in ...

More Episodes Like This


Daring to Fail Forward: The Mindset Catalyzing Healthcare Breakthroughs – Christian Howell : 34

This episode features an interview with Christian Howell, Chief Commercial Officer at Cognito Therapeutics, a biotech company pioneering a neurotechnology approach to treat Alzheimer's disease. Christian draws on his diverse background spanning the mili...

Avoiding Common Pitfalls in the Biotech Development Process – Dr. Thomas Lönngren : 33

Episode Overview: In this podcast interview, Ramin Farhood hosts Dr. Thomas Lönngren, an expert in drug regulation, approval, and market access. Thomas has an impressive career spanning over three decades, including a transformative tenure as the exe...

Redefining Roles: From Medical Practice to Biotech Ventures : 32

Biotech leadership thrives on diverse experiences and willingness to face new challenges. Effective leaders cultivate collaborative teams, promote adaptability, and balance innovation with financial constraints as they grow their companies.

Balancing Current Needs and Long-Term Goals in Biotech : 31

Building evolving biotech organizations requires balancing short-term demands with long-term objectives. Leveraging leaders as cross-functional connectors and prioritizing self-awareness and humility are paramount for driving organizational success.

Growing Early Biotech Startups Through Connection – Dan Bloomfield : 30

Gaining cross-functional exposure and leveraging expertise across the organization is invaluable. Building optimal teams through full-time hires and consultants, and cultivating an entrepreneurial mindset drives success in leadership roles.

Lessons In Biotechs with Bold Missions : 29

Large-scale studies and longitudinal data play key roles in demonstrating impact on outcomes, costs, and clinical utility. These research efforts, when meeting established standards, can support significant advancements in patient care approaches.


You don't have to go it alone! Our experienced team has been there before, and we're ready to guide you through the unknown. Share your challenges with us, and together, we'll create a plan to efficiently reach your milestones and turn your vision into reality.

Building Better Biotechs.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.