Understanding the growing gap between approval and access

Expedited regulatory pathways have enabled faster approvals in oncology, often based on early efficacy signals in high-need populations. Yet the same evidence that supports approval frequently falls short of payer and HTA expectations for durability, comparative effectiveness, and value. This paper examines how evidentiary thresholds diverge between regulators and payers, why this gap is widening across novel oncology modalities, and what it means for sponsors seeking to translate early approval into sustained access.

Authors

Dr Chantal W.M. van Gils

VP Evidence & Value

Sigrid Klaar

Medical Advisor Regulatory

Ingela Loell

Scientific Editor

LET’S TALK

You don't have to go it alone!

Our experienced team has been there before, and we're ready to guide you through the unknown. Share your challenges with us, and together, we'll create a plan to efficiently reach your milestones and turn your vision into reality.

Building Better Biotechs